In Burgess v Lejonvarn the court rejected, on the facts, the claimants’ allegations of negligence and breach of duty in respect of design and project management obligations, inspection, preparation of budget and assessing and approving payments, amongst others. The “global claim”, by which the claimants tried to claim the difference between the costs incurred and those which would have been incurred if the claimants had stuck with their original designer, was described as “offending common sense”. Please see below for Frances Gordon-Weeks’ and Jonathan Spencer’s article on this interesting decision.
High Court dismisses negligence claim against architect on every count: Burgess v Lejonvarn
This document (and any information accessed through links in this document) is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Professional legal advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.