By clicking on the links on the left, you will be able to access relevant EU legislation, the legislative and regulatory provisions relating to implementation in the UK and detailed briefing notes produced by Simmons & Simmons.
The Benchmarks Regulation is intended to prohibit the use by a supervised entity in the European Union of unauthorised benchmarks, including benchmarks prepared by unregistered non-EU administrators from non-equivalent jurisdictions and to enhance the single market by creating a common framework across Member States. By limiting the ability of national administrators to set benchmarks rates using their own discretion, it is hoped that conflicts of interests will be reduced and confidence will be restored in the accuracy and integrity of benchmarks.
The Regulation seeks to:
- improve governance and controls over the benchmark process, in particular to ensure that administrators avoid conflicts of interest, or at least manage them adequately
- improve the quality of input data and methodologies used by benchmark administrators
- ensure that contributors to benchmarks and the data they provide are subject to adequate controls, in particular to avoid conflicts of interest, and
- protect consumers and investors through greater transparency and adequate rights of redress.
The Regulation aims to address potential issues at each stage of the benchmark process and will apply in respect of:
- the provision of benchmarks
- the contribution of input data to a benchmark, and
- the use of a benchmark by a supervised entity within the EU.
- Benchmark categories
The Regulation defines a "benchmark" as “any index by reference to which the amount payable under a financial instrument or a financial contract, or the value of financial instrument is determined or an index that is used to measure the performance of an investment fund.”
The Regulation sets three main categories of benchmarks:
- These are benchmarks used for financial instruments, contracts and performance of investment funds having a total value of at least €500bn, and meeting qualitative criteria such as location of contributors and importance of the benchmark in the country where a majority of contributors is located.
- Administrators of critical benchmarks have to comply with all requirements set out in the Regulation.
- These are benchmarks used for financial instruments, contracts and performance of investment funds having a total value of at least €50bn over a period of six months, and meeting qualitative criteria such as the benchmark has no reliable substitute, and its absence would lead to market disorder.
- Administrators of significant benchmarks do not have the mandatory obligation to comply with all the rules related to governance, control of administrators and input data, but have to comply with the other provisions in the Regulation.
- These are benchmarks that do not fulfill the conditions set for critical or significant benchmarks.
- Administrators of non-significant benchmarks are subject to a lighter regulatory regime based on a compliance statement - administrators are exempt from governance, control of administrators and input data, but have to comply with the code of conduct rules.
- Administrator requirements
An administrator is defined in the Regulation as a natural or legal person that has control over the provision of a benchmark, and in particular administers the arrangements for determining the benchmark, collects and analyses the input data, determines the benchmark, and either directly publishes or outsources the publication or the calculation of the benchmark to a third party.
In order to ensure the integrity of benchmarks, administrators are subject to a number of requirements, including:
- implementation of adequate governance arrangements
- establishment of a permanent and effective oversight function
- outsourcing limitations
- adoption of a code of conduct specifying obligations of contributors in respect of input data, and in particular its reliability and consistency with the benchmark administrator’s controls and methodology
- publication of benchmark statements providing key information to users in relation to the benchmarks measures and their vulnerabilities
- systems and controls to ensure integrity of data
- complaints handling mechanisms, and
- adequate record keeping requirements.
Administrators providing benchmarks must by authorised. Alternatively, when benchmarks are non-significant or provided by a supervised entity other than an administrator, they can apply for registration with a competent authority.
- Input data
- Contributor requirements
The Regulation imposes obligations on supervised contributors making them subject to adequate governance and controls requirements, specifically to avoid conflicts of interest.
Contributors are also required to adhere to a legally binding code of conduct adopted by administrators, and can be required by competent authorities to contribute to critical benchmarks to preserve their credibility.
- Use of a benchmark
- Third country regimes
This document (and any information accessed through links in this document) is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Professional legal advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.