You are here: Inicio Temas Jurídicos Litigos - Mercantiles Riesgo profesional y de seguro
Enviado: 18 June 2013
この記事では、最近の英国控訴裁判所によるJohn Grimes Partnership Ltd v Gubbins事件の判決について検討します。
Enviado: 13 June 2013
The limitation period ran from the date of a previous Court judgment, which constituted expert advice by which the claimants obtained the relevant knowledge. Chandra and another v Brooke North & Anr  EWCH 417 (QB.
‘Spiked’ EL insurers held 100% liable for mesothelioma claims with no recourse against employer or other insurers for remainder of employment period.
Última revisión: 06 June 2013 / Enviado: 22 December 2012
The French Supreme Court has ruled that a clause binding one party, but not the other, to bring proceedings exclusively in one jurisdiction is unenforceable.
Enviado: 03 May 2013
This month Pollyanna considers a number of issues relating to Consumer Insurance and AIFM Directive.
Enviado: 16 April 2013
This article considers the four key types of insurance in UK construction and engineering projects.
Enviado: 27 March 2013
A firm of solicitors was negligent in failing to advise a client of the full risks involved in a transaction, despite time pressure.
Losses suffered by the reinsurers arising out of the 9/11 attack on the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York were caused by two separate occurrences arising from separate events.
Court of Appeal finds that loss flowing from a breach of contract due to market fluctuation is foreseeable if such loss is “not unlikely to result” from the breach.
© Simmons & Simmons LLP 2017. All rights reserved. Registered in England & Wales Registered Number OC352713
elexica Limited, CityPoint, One Ropemaker Street, London EC2Y 9SS T: +44 20 7628 2020